2026 Juniors Metropolitan Competition · Under 14 Boys
| Team | Played | Wins | Draws | Losses | Forfeits | BYEs | For | Against | Diff. | Points | WR*1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1. Seacliff Hockey Club U14B | 8 | 7 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 30 | 10 | 20 | 21 | 88% |
| 2. Port Adelaide District Hockey Club | 8 | 7 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 24 | 11 | 13 | 21 | 88% |
| 3. Adelaide Hockey Club | 8 | 5 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 35 | 6 | 29 | 16 | 67% |
| 4. Adelaide Hills Hockey Club | 8 | 4 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 42 | 12 | 30 | 14 | 58% |
| 5. Grange Royals Hockey Club | 8 | 3 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 16 | 13 | 3 | 12 | 50% |
| 6. Burnside Hockey Club | 8 | 3 | 1 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 26 | 23 | 3 | 10 | 42% |
| 7. North East Hockey Club u14B | 8 | 2 | 1 | 5 | 0 | 1 | 19 | 27 | -8 | 7 | 29% |
| 8. Woodville Hockey Club U14 B | 8 | 1 | 0 | 7 | 0 | 1 | 9 | 60 | -51 | 3 | 13% |
| 9. Forestville Hockey Club | 8 | 0 | 0 | 8 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 43 | -39 | 0 | 0% |
The ladder is correct based on any results that are available.
1 The WR column is a Win Ratio. It calculates the number of points
received, out of the number of points possible, and is the basis for ranking the
ladders. It is a fair measure, especially if
teams do not play an equal number of games.
