2026 Seniors Metropolitan Competition · Metro 2 Women
| Team | Played | Wins | Draws | Losses | Forfeits | BYEs | For | Against | Diff. | Points | WR*1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1. Adelaide Hockey Club | 17 | 15 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 81 | 9 | 72 | 46 | 90% |
| 2. Burnside Hockey Club | 18 | 15 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 60 | 14 | 46 | 47 | 87% |
| 3. Forestville Hockey Club | 18 | 10 | 4 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 36 | 27 | 9 | 34 | 63% |
| 4. Port Adelaide District Hockey Club | 18 | 7 | 4 | 7 | 0 | 0 | 29 | 25 | 4 | 25 | 46% |
| 5. Woodville Hockey Club M2W | 17 | 4 | 3 | 10 | 0 | 0 | 22 | 46 | -24 | 15 | 29% |
| 6. Adelaide University Hockey Club | 18 | 4 | 3 | 11 | 0 | 0 | 23 | 55 | -32 | 15 | 28% |
| 7. Seacliff Hockey Club M2W | 18 | 4 | 1 | 11 | 2 | 0 | 9 | 47 | -38 | 13 | 24% |
| 8. Adelaide Hills Hockey Club | 18 | 1 | 4 | 13 | 0 | 0 | 11 | 48 | -37 | 7 | 13% |
The ladder is correct based on any results that are available.
1 The WR column is a Win Ratio. It calculates the number of points
received, out of the number of points possible, and is the basis for ranking the
ladders. It is a fair measure, especially if
teams do not play an equal number of games.
