2026 Seniors Metropolitan Competition · Metro 2 Men
| Team | Played | Wins | Draws | Losses | Forfeits | BYEs | For | Against | Diff. | Points | WR*1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1. Forestville Hockey Club | 18 | 14 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 44 | 20 | 24 | 45 | 83% |
| 2. Adelaide University Hockey Club | 18 | 13 | 1 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 47 | 19 | 28 | 40 | 74% |
| 3. Prince Alfred Collegians Hockey Club | 18 | 11 | 3 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 49 | 32 | 17 | 36 | 67% |
| 4. Seacliff Hockey Club M2M | 18 | 11 | 1 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 53 | 40 | 13 | 34 | 63% |
| 5. Port Adelaide District Hockey Club | 18 | 7 | 1 | 10 | 0 | 0 | 37 | 32 | 5 | 22 | 41% |
| 6. North East Hockey Club M2M | 18 | 5 | 3 | 10 | 0 | 0 | 37 | 40 | -3 | 18 | 33% |
| 7. Adelaide Hills Hockey Club | 18 | 2 | 2 | 14 | 0 | 0 | 15 | 45 | -30 | 8 | 15% |
| 8. Flinders University Hockey Club - M2M | 18 | 1 | 2 | 15 | 0 | 0 | 13 | 67 | -54 | 5 | 9% |
The ladder is correct based on any results that are available.
1 The WR column is a Win Ratio. It calculates the number of points
received, out of the number of points possible, and is the basis for ranking the
ladders. It is a fair measure, especially if
teams do not play an equal number of games.
