2026 Seniors Metropolitan Competition · Metro 2 Men
| Team | Played | Wins | Draws | Losses | Forfeits | BYEs | For | Against | Diff. | Points | WR*1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1. Prince Alfred Collegians Hockey Club | 12 | 10 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 37 | 16 | 21 | 31 | 86% |
| 2. Forestville Hockey Club | 12 | 10 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 30 | 15 | 15 | 31 | 86% |
| 3. Adelaide University Hockey Club | 12 | 9 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 33 | 12 | 21 | 27 | 75% |
| 4. Seacliff Hockey Club M2M | 12 | 7 | 0 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 38 | 28 | 10 | 21 | 58% |
| 5. Port Adelaide District Hockey Club | 12 | 5 | 0 | 7 | 0 | 0 | 22 | 21 | 1 | 15 | 42% |
| 6. North East Hockey Club M2M | 12 | 2 | 1 | 9 | 0 | 0 | 15 | 31 | -16 | 7 | 19% |
| 7. Adelaide Hills Hockey Club | 12 | 2 | 1 | 9 | 0 | 0 | 10 | 29 | -19 | 7 | 19% |
| 8. Flinders University Hockey Club - M2M | 12 | 0 | 2 | 10 | 0 | 0 | 9 | 42 | -33 | 2 | 6% |
The ladder is correct based on any results that are available.
1 The WR column is a Win Ratio. It calculates the number of points
received, out of the number of points possible, and is the basis for ranking the
ladders. It is a fair measure, especially if
teams do not play an equal number of games.
