2026 Seniors Metropolitan Competition · Metro 2 Men
| Team | Played | Wins | Draws | Losses | Forfeits | BYEs | For | Against | Diff. | Points | WR*1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1. Forestville Hockey Club | 15 | 12 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 39 | 17 | 22 | 38 | 84% |
| 2. Prince Alfred Collegians Hockey Club | 15 | 11 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 45 | 22 | 23 | 36 | 80% |
| 3. Adelaide University Hockey Club | 15 | 10 | 1 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 38 | 17 | 21 | 31 | 69% |
| 4. Seacliff Hockey Club M2M | 15 | 8 | 1 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 43 | 35 | 8 | 25 | 56% |
| 5. Port Adelaide District Hockey Club | 14 | 6 | 1 | 7 | 0 | 0 | 30 | 26 | 4 | 19 | 45% |
| 6. North East Hockey Club M2M | 14 | 3 | 2 | 9 | 0 | 0 | 26 | 34 | -8 | 11 | 26% |
| 7. Adelaide Hills Hockey Club | 15 | 2 | 2 | 11 | 0 | 0 | 14 | 38 | -24 | 8 | 18% |
| 8. Flinders University Hockey Club - M2M | 15 | 0 | 2 | 13 | 0 | 0 | 11 | 57 | -46 | 2 | 4% |
The ladder is correct based on any results that are available.
1 The WR column is a Win Ratio. It calculates the number of points
received, out of the number of points possible, and is the basis for ranking the
ladders. It is a fair measure, especially if
teams do not play an equal number of games.
