2026 Seniors Metropolitan Competition · Metro 1 Men
| Team | Played | Wins | Draws | Losses | Forfeits | BYEs | For | Against | Diff. | Points | WR*1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1. Adelaide Hockey Club | 12 | 10 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 58 | 22 | 36 | 31 | 86% |
| 2. Port Adelaide District Hockey Club | 12 | 9 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 42 | 14 | 28 | 29 | 81% |
| 3. Seacliff Hockey Club M1M | 12 | 9 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 47 | 22 | 25 | 28 | 78% |
| 4. North East Hockey Club M1M | 12 | 5 | 3 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 24 | 24 | 0 | 18 | 50% |
| 5. Woodville Hockey Club M1M | 12 | 6 | 0 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 38 | 41 | -3 | 18 | 50% |
| 6. Forestville Hockey Club | 12 | 3 | 1 | 8 | 0 | 0 | 20 | 48 | -28 | 10 | 28% |
| 7. Burnside Hockey Club | 12 | 2 | 0 | 10 | 0 | 0 | 24 | 45 | -21 | 6 | 17% |
| 8. Grange Royals Hockey Club | 12 | 0 | 0 | 12 | 0 | 0 | 16 | 53 | -37 | 0 | 0% |
The ladder is correct based on any results that are available.
1 The WR column is a Win Ratio. It calculates the number of points
received, out of the number of points possible, and is the basis for ranking the
ladders. It is a fair measure, especially if
teams do not play an equal number of games.
