2026 Seniors Metropolitan Competition · Metro 1 Men
| Team | Played | Wins | Draws | Losses | Forfeits | BYEs | For | Against | Diff. | Points | WR*1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1. Adelaide Hockey Club | 14 | 11 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 63 | 25 | 38 | 35 | 83% |
| 2. Seacliff Hockey Club M1M | 14 | 11 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 53 | 23 | 30 | 34 | 81% |
| 3. Port Adelaide District Hockey Club | 14 | 10 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 47 | 17 | 30 | 33 | 79% |
| 4. North East Hockey Club M1M | 14 | 6 | 3 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 29 | 30 | -1 | 21 | 50% |
| 5. Woodville Hockey Club M1M | 14 | 7 | 0 | 7 | 0 | 0 | 43 | 46 | -3 | 21 | 50% |
| 6. Forestville Hockey Club | 14 | 3 | 1 | 10 | 0 | 0 | 22 | 55 | -33 | 10 | 24% |
| 7. Burnside Hockey Club | 14 | 3 | 0 | 11 | 0 | 0 | 33 | 50 | -17 | 9 | 21% |
| 8. Grange Royals Hockey Club | 14 | 0 | 0 | 14 | 0 | 0 | 18 | 62 | -44 | 0 | 0% |
The ladder is correct based on any results that are available.
1 The WR column is a Win Ratio. It calculates the number of points
received, out of the number of points possible, and is the basis for ranking the
ladders. It is a fair measure, especially if
teams do not play an equal number of games.
