Hockey SA 2024 Senior Metroplitan Competiton · Metro 5 Men
Team | Played | Wins | Draws | Losses | BYEs | For | Against | Diff. | Points | WR*1 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1. Seacliff Hockey Club | 6 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 36 | 4 | 32 | 18 | 100% |
2. Adelaide Hockey Club | 6 | 5 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 21 | 15 | 6 | 15 | 83% |
3. Port Adelaide District Hockey Club | 6 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 20 | 7 | 13 | 13 | 72% |
4. University of South Australia Hockey Club | 6 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 13 | 19 | -6 | 10 | 56% |
5. North East Hockey Club | 6 | 3 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 19 | 19 | 0 | 9 | 50% |
6. Forestville Hockey Club | 6 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 0 | 13 | 14 | -1 | 7 | 39% |
7. Woodville Hockey Club | 6 | 2 | 0 | 4 | 0 | 10 | 16 | -6 | 6 | 33% |
8. Adelaide University Hockey Club | 6 | 1 | 1 | 4 | 0 | 5 | 14 | -9 | 4 | 22% |
9. Grange Royals Hockey Club | 6 | 1 | 0 | 5 | 0 | 7 | 20 | -13 | 3 | 17% |
10. St Peter's Old Collegians' Hockey Club | 6 | 1 | 0 | 5 | 0 | 8 | 24 | -16 | 3 | 17% |
The ladder is correct based on any results that are available.
1 The WR column is a Win Ratio. It calculates the number of points
received, out of the number of points possible, and is the basis for ranking the
ladders. It is a fair measure, especially if
teams do not play an equal number of games.