2026 Juniors Metropolitan Competition · Under 12 Boys
| Team | Played | Wins | Draws | Losses | Forfeits | BYEs | For | Against | Diff. | Points | WR*1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1. Adelaide Hockey Club | 11 | 11 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 62 | 2 | 60 | 33 | 100% |
| 2. Forestville Hockey Club White | 11 | 8 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 33 | 10 | 23 | 26 | 79% |
| 3. Seacliff Hockey Club U12B | 11 | 8 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 54 | 20 | 34 | 25 | 76% |
| 4. Grange Royals Hockey Club | 11 | 8 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 29 | 18 | 11 | 24 | 73% |
| 5. Burnside Hockey Club | 11 | 7 | 0 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 43 | 18 | 25 | 21 | 64% |
| 6. Woodville Hockey Club U12 B | 10 | 5 | 0 | 5 | 0 | 2 | 31 | 19 | 12 | 15 | 50% |
| 7. Adelaide Hills Hockey Club | 11 | 4 | 0 | 7 | 0 | 1 | 24 | 42 | -18 | 12 | 36% |
| 8. North East Hockey Club U12B | 11 | 3 | 1 | 7 | 0 | 1 | 24 | 40 | -16 | 10 | 30% |
| 9. Forestville Hockey Club Blue | 11 | 2 | 1 | 8 | 0 | 1 | 19 | 36 | -17 | 7 | 21% |
| 10. Enfield Hockey Club | 11 | 1 | 1 | 9 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 56 | -52 | 4 | 12% |
| 11. Adelaide University Hockey Club | 11 | 0 | 0 | 11 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 66 | -62 | 0 | 0% |
The ladder is correct based on any results that are available.
1 The WR column is a Win Ratio. It calculates the number of points
received, out of the number of points possible, and is the basis for ranking the
ladders. It is a fair measure, especially if
teams do not play an equal number of games.
