2026 Seniors Metropolitan Competition · Metro 6 Men
| Team | Played | Wins | Draws | Losses | Forfeits | BYEs | For | Against | Diff. | Points | WR*1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1. Enfield Hockey Club | 12 | 10 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 53 | 14 | 39 | 32 | 89% |
| 2. Seacliff Hockey Club M6M | 12 | 8 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 42 | 13 | 29 | 27 | 75% |
| 3. Adelaide University Hockey Club | 12 | 7 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 52 | 19 | 33 | 24 | 67% |
| 4. Port Adelaide District Hockey Club | 12 | 7 | 2 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 38 | 19 | 19 | 23 | 64% |
| 5. Burnside Hockey Club | 12 | 6 | 0 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 24 | 23 | 1 | 18 | 50% |
| 6. Westminster Hockey Club M6M | 12 | 4 | 3 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 18 | 27 | -9 | 15 | 42% |
| 7. Flinders University Hockey Club - M6M | 12 | 4 | 1 | 7 | 0 | 0 | 26 | 40 | -14 | 13 | 36% |
| 8. Forestville Hockey Club | 12 | 3 | 1 | 8 | 0 | 0 | 20 | 33 | -13 | 10 | 28% |
| 9. Grange Royals Hockey Club | 12 | 2 | 2 | 8 | 0 | 0 | 11 | 39 | -28 | 8 | 22% |
| 10. Woodville Hockey Club M6M | 12 | 0 | 1 | 11 | 0 | 0 | 14 | 71 | -57 | 1 | 3% |
The ladder is correct based on any results that are available.
1 The WR column is a Win Ratio. It calculates the number of points
received, out of the number of points possible, and is the basis for ranking the
ladders. It is a fair measure, especially if
teams do not play an equal number of games.
