2026 Seniors Metropolitan Competition · Metro 6 Men
| Team | Played | Wins | Draws | Losses | Forfeits | BYEs | For | Against | Diff. | Points | WR*1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1. Enfield Hockey Club | 15 | 12 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 67 | 17 | 50 | 39 | 87% |
| 2. Seacliff Hockey Club M6M | 15 | 10 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 49 | 18 | 31 | 33 | 73% |
| 3. Adelaide University Hockey Club | 15 | 9 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 66 | 24 | 42 | 30 | 67% |
| 4. Port Adelaide District Hockey Club | 15 | 9 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 46 | 23 | 23 | 30 | 67% |
| 5. Westminster Hockey Club M6M | 15 | 6 | 3 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 22 | 32 | -10 | 21 | 47% |
| 6. Burnside Hockey Club | 15 | 6 | 1 | 8 | 0 | 0 | 26 | 31 | -5 | 19 | 42% |
| 7. Forestville Hockey Club | 15 | 5 | 2 | 8 | 0 | 0 | 34 | 35 | -1 | 17 | 38% |
| 8. Flinders University Hockey Club - M6M | 15 | 4 | 1 | 10 | 0 | 0 | 28 | 48 | -20 | 13 | 29% |
| 9. Grange Royals Hockey Club | 15 | 2 | 2 | 11 | 0 | 0 | 12 | 56 | -44 | 8 | 18% |
| 10. Woodville Hockey Club M6M | 15 | 1 | 1 | 13 | 0 | 0 | 22 | 88 | -66 | 4 | 9% |
The ladder is correct based on any results that are available.
1 The WR column is a Win Ratio. It calculates the number of points
received, out of the number of points possible, and is the basis for ranking the
ladders. It is a fair measure, especially if
teams do not play an equal number of games.
