2026 Seniors Metropolitan Competition · Metro 5 Men
| Team | Played | Wins | Draws | Losses | Forfeits | BYEs | For | Against | Diff. | Points | WR*1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1. Seacliff Hockey Club M5M | 15 | 15 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 70 | 11 | 59 | 45 | 100% |
| 2. Westminster Hockey Club M5M | 15 | 12 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 56 | 22 | 34 | 36 | 80% |
| 3. Port Adelaide District Hockey Club | 15 | 11 | 1 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 78 | 21 | 57 | 34 | 76% |
| 4. Adelaide Hockey Club | 15 | 9 | 2 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 37 | 22 | 15 | 29 | 64% |
| 5. Woodville Hockey Club M5M | 15 | 7 | 2 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 37 | 47 | -10 | 23 | 51% |
| 6. Adelaide University Hockey Club Purple | 15 | 6 | 4 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 39 | 31 | 8 | 22 | 49% |
| 7. Forestville Hockey Club | 15 | 6 | 4 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 38 | 34 | 4 | 22 | 49% |
| 8. Grange Royals Hockey Club | 15 | 3 | 5 | 7 | 0 | 0 | 25 | 46 | -21 | 14 | 31% |
| 9. St. Peter's Old Collegians' Hockey Club | 15 | 4 | 1 | 10 | 0 | 0 | 33 | 41 | -8 | 13 | 29% |
| 10. North East Hockey Club M5M | 15 | 2 | 4 | 9 | 0 | 0 | 24 | 36 | -12 | 10 | 22% |
| 11. Adelaide University Hockey Club Black | 15 | 2 | 1 | 12 | 0 | 0 | 12 | 64 | -52 | 7 | 16% |
| 12. Adelaide Hills Hockey Club | 15 | 1 | 0 | 13 | 1 | 0 | 13 | 87 | -74 | 3 | 7% |
The ladder is correct based on any results that are available.
1 The WR column is a Win Ratio. It calculates the number of points
received, out of the number of points possible, and is the basis for ranking the
ladders. It is a fair measure, especially if
teams do not play an equal number of games.
