2026 Seniors Metropolitan Competition · Metro 4 Women
| Team | Played | Wins | Draws | Losses | Forfeits | BYEs | For | Against | Diff. | Points | WR*1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1. Adelaide Hockey Club | 15 | 10 | 2 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 46 | 16 | 30 | 32 | 71% |
| 2. Port Adelaide District Hockey Club | 15 | 9 | 4 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 31 | 12 | 19 | 31 | 69% |
| 3. Enfield Hockey Club | 15 | 8 | 4 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 28 | 19 | 9 | 28 | 62% |
| 4. Seacliff Hockey Club M4W | 15 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 18 | 20 | -2 | 20 | 44% |
| 5. Burnside Hockey Club | 15 | 6 | 2 | 7 | 0 | 0 | 21 | 31 | -10 | 20 | 44% |
| 6. Grange Royals Hockey Club | 15 | 2 | 10 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 13 | 21 | -8 | 16 | 36% |
| 7. Adelaide University Hockey Club | 15 | 4 | 3 | 8 | 0 | 0 | 17 | 26 | -9 | 15 | 33% |
| 8. North East Hockey Club M4W | 15 | 3 | 5 | 7 | 0 | 0 | 15 | 27 | -12 | 14 | 31% |
| 9. Forestville Hockey Club | 15 | 1 | 9 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 8 | 17 | -9 | 12 | 27% |
| 10. St. Peter's Old Collegians' Hockey Club | 15 | 1 | 8 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 16 | 24 | -8 | 11 | 24% |
The ladder is correct based on any results that are available.
1 The WR column is a Win Ratio. It calculates the number of points
received, out of the number of points possible, and is the basis for ranking the
ladders. It is a fair measure, especially if
teams do not play an equal number of games.
