2026 Seniors Metropolitan Competition · Metro 1 Women
| Team | Played | Wins | Draws | Losses | Forfeits | BYEs | For | Against | Diff. | Points | WR*1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1. Adelaide Hockey Club | 14 | 12 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 52 | 7 | 45 | 37 | 88% |
| 2. Port Adelaide District Hockey Club | 14 | 10 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 46 | 8 | 38 | 33 | 79% |
| 3. Seacliff Hockey Club M1W | 14 | 9 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 36 | 12 | 24 | 30 | 71% |
| 4. North East Hockey Club M1W | 14 | 5 | 2 | 7 | 0 | 0 | 16 | 21 | -5 | 17 | 40% |
| 5. Adelaide University Hockey Club | 14 | 4 | 3 | 7 | 0 | 0 | 19 | 29 | -10 | 15 | 36% |
| 6. St. Peter's Old Collegians' Hockey Club | 14 | 3 | 3 | 8 | 0 | 0 | 14 | 37 | -23 | 12 | 29% |
| 7. Grange Royals Hockey Club | 14 | 2 | 2 | 10 | 0 | 0 | 12 | 51 | -39 | 8 | 19% |
| 8. Burnside Hockey Club | 14 | 2 | 1 | 10 | 1 | 0 | 15 | 45 | -30 | 7 | 17% |
The ladder is correct based on any results that are available.
1 The WR column is a Win Ratio. It calculates the number of points
received, out of the number of points possible, and is the basis for ranking the
ladders. It is a fair measure, especially if
teams do not play an equal number of games.